mein lieber a.
've only noticed today that you have a comment posted hast.vielen thanks for mühe.ich'll try on a few points of your criticism very geschäzten respond and clarify what I'm getting (comment in UPPERCASE):
Paid always! THE WRONG SO DO NOT EVEN PAY MAY BE ONLY 'AS LONG AS IT MAKES MONEY, OR. AS LONG AS THIS IS ACCEPTS.
I am still not entirely clear what you're getting. I think it is fantastic that you submit these texts, although I will criticize here (but only in content)! The writing style is bad polemic, that is not always very argumentative, what the thoughts are not more but less persuasive awards. Polemical and simplistic example is the casino and the usual socialist-capitalist polarization. THE REALITY IS FAR SAD (SEE MONEY CREATION, Scylla III) AS THOSE OF ME BADLY CHOSEN METAPHER.ICH SPEAK NOT OF SOCIALISM IN THE MEANING OF IDEOLGISCHEN SYSTEMS, BUT IN THE ART AS CASH FLOWS CONCLUSION. WHERE TO STAAAT any bank or companies trying to keep alive MAY OR MAY NOT ALLOW they die, HE HAS THE defacto control over what happens, something like this IS PRECISELY NOT A SOCIAL OR OTHERWISE AN MARKTWIRTSCHAFT.Dass there are highly speculative business that krimminellen handling is the capital of others is clear to both of us. But that is too weak a whole economic system diskreditieren.WARUM NOT? THE 70 YEARS SINCE THERE ARE THOSE FINANCIAL BUBBLE CAPITALISM. THE REAL WAGES ARE 90 YEARS SINCE THE GLOBAL CAPITALISM RÜCKLÄUFIG.WENN of the financial bubble got out of SO IS THE ONLY THEN HE OWES THE BANK SYSTEM. IF THE BANK SYSTEM WILL EINKRACHT BECAUSE THIS SYSTEM HAS COME TO ITS LIMITS. NOW IS THE BRANND WITH GASOLINE AND DELETE THE GROUND FOR EVEN GREATER DISASTER IN THE FUTURE GELEGT.Über grants, acquisitions, and supports the economy is hotly debated in Germany. The acquisition of Opel is off the table. The public, especially the business sector itself to defend themselves against such strategies. NOT QUITE AS YOU CAN SEE IS ULTIMATELY MORE PRECISELY IS NOW AN FORMSACHE.MAN POSSIBLE PRIVATE INVESTOR LOANS OR GUARANTEES. ALSO WAS THE ONLY ONE SMALL example of many. More interesting is because even the HYPO REAL ESTATE.Ich will not let this go by the board that supports (abwrakprämie, etc) are a big mistake for the auto industry, certainly more than that, it is scandalous. And very surprised that the neocons and the liberal market of the past now demand government action over night if they need money. THE YES IT IS WILL.Man point I should not demonize the pragmatists in the ideology cry The acquisition of a bank that is ailing, is in my Meinung nach etwas ganz anderes und ein vergleich mit dem östlichen Staatskapitalismus ist schon sehr bemüht.ICH HABE ABER WAS GEGEN PRAGMATIKER, DIE SICH WEDER DADURCH QUALIFIZIEREN, DAß SIE EINEN NACHVOLLZIEHBAREN ZUKUNFTSPLAN VORWEISEN KÖNNEN, NOCH DAß SIE AUS DEN FEHLERN DER VERGANGENHEIT GELERNT HÄTTEN. HIER WIRD EINDEUTIG DER ALKOHLIKER MIT SCHNAPS GEHEILT.1. hat und muss die Gemeinschaft sich das Recht nehmen, Ihr Wirtschaftssystem zu schützen und stützen, wenn es durch einen Zusammenbruch im Finanzsektor kommt. DIE FRAGE IST OB SIE DAS ÜBERHAUPT WILL.Dass ist etwas anderes, als der Zusammenbruch eines Konzerns. Ohne Kredite kein Wirtschaften. ABER OHNE WIRTSCHAFTEN KREDIT?!Eine Bank ist vielleicht fahrlässig geführt worden, dann muss man, wenn es kriminell war, rechtlich vorgehen, oder wenn Fehler begangen wurden, Konsequenzen ziehen. ES GEHT JA WIE GESAGT NICHT UM EINE BANK SONDERN UM DAS BANKENSYSTEM IN SEINER GESAMTHEIT. Die Bank ist aber kein Spielgeld einer Einzelperson am Roulettetisch, die man hinterher entschädigt, weil Sie verloren hat. GUT, NENN ES NICHT ROULETTE, NENN ES SPEKULATION UND VÖLLIG AUSUFERNDE, REALITÄTSFREMDE RISIKOBEREITSCHAFT. WENN ICH 10000 AN DER BÖRSE VERZOCKE, DANN BEKOMME ICH AM ENDE KEINEN BONUS. DIE BANKENCHEFS SEHR WOHL.UND DU UND ICH DÜRFEN INDIREKT DIERECHNUNG DAFÜR BEZAHLEN.Wenn das gesellschaftliche Gleichgewicht auseinanderzubrechen droht, muss die Gesellschaft eingreifen, egal in welchem -ismus, ganz pragmatisch. WHAT A BALANCE AT 75% Global poverty? The strength of each order is the flexibility and pragmatism. I think this PRAGMATISM AS TOLD TO BE DURABLE AS THE MAN TO BUILD LONG-TERM CAN that was lacking in the social experiments in the East among others. Of pragmatism HATS NOW REALLY WAS NOT THE REASON FOR THE GEFEHLT.VIELLEICHT NIEGERGANG THIS SYSTEM EVEN BE ÜBERPRAGMATISMUS. The Begrif "capitalism," says just as the term "socialism" (which to be over 250 definitions and guidelines refers), and "socialism in the Marxian sense," says as much as if you take the Old Testament and argue that described exactly is, like Paradis has to look, and it only duplicated müsste.In just your tone resonates with a lot of envy and malice for big business, which is different than criticism. I envy the large capital-IN ANY WAY. I AM EVEN THINK OF EVERYTHING BUT YOU SHOULD BE BASED ON JUDGE MAY ORDER FROM THE NEW WHAT MAY RESULT shambles. MY REVIEW IS AGAINST THE STATE MAKROKLEMPNEREI. Socialism has been used as an alternative slogan, not because it was the Bolsheviks, but because it is only the other side of the coin, which is based on a materialistic world view - I have to give Ehrich Fromm exceptionally right. REALISM IS NOT MATE YES PER SE WAS BAD. THE WHOLE BUILDING TO MARX AUF.Es lacks an ethical foundation, on which the companies aufbauen.DAS CAN YOU SAY WELL. For Adenauer and the Nachriegsjahre was the Christian ethical maxim NA, DA BUT THERE WERE ALSO A FEW PERSONAL INTERESTS OF MR ADENAUER, bewirkthat enormous, perhaps as much as the Marshall Plan. The religions of us can only be a faint echo, we must continue searching for a new social contract. Marx has a scientific view of the 19th Century that helps us for a real Neuausrichting not weiter.MARX IN EXCESS OF ITS GENERAL ACCOUNT TO ARTIFICIAL STRUCTURES OF ORTHODOX ECONOMIC SCHOOL IN SIZE ERFURCHTSGEBIETENDER. HE IS CURRENT THAN EVER. Our current understanding of World is much more complex geworden.DAS I WAGE IN RELATION TO THE GOODS PRODUCING SYSTEM IN DOUBT. VALUE IS STILL IN THE PRODUCTION GESCHAFFEN.FINANZBLASEN pretend REAL ACCUMULATION ONLY SHORT TIME BEFORE AND DISAPPEAR AGAIN. TOTAL PROFIT MATTER IS AS OF MARX predicted SUNK. The question is, you trust the individual or the collective, or is there an alternative. Until now we more or less trust ourselves, and go outside control and major compromises in communities out of the way as yours and my life zeigen.DAS IS ALSO THE FACT THAT MAN WITH THE IDEA OF Individualism grew up. AS LONG AS THE SYSTEM MUST not break, WILL NOT THE CHANGE. EVERYONE IS THE SMALL HOLES IN SEARCH OF STRUCTURE TO IT COME ON SMALL FORT GUARANTEE. STILL IS NOT THE TIME TO INDIVIDUALISM VERY PRODUKTIV.ALLES LIEBEB.
0 comments:
Post a Comment